We are here for your questions anytime 24/7, welcome your consultation.
Get PriceState of Uttarakhand Vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher | Latest Supreme . Sep 15, 2017 Full text of the Supreme Court Judgment:State of Uttarakhand Vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher. State of U.P. has framed the Rules, namely, the Uttar Pradesh M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher filed a writ petition praying for quashing Get Price
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit Fee can be made on the finished items of stone i.e. stone grits, sand grits & chips etc
Get PriceOct 03, 2017 On 15 September 2017, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of
Get PriceHimalaya Stone Crusher Pvt.Ltd. vs State Of Uttarakhand . on 16 December, 2014. User Queries. pollution. environment. ... Supreme Court of India. M.C.Mehta vs Union Of India And Ors on 14 March, 1991 ... The Judgement of the Court was delivered by. RANGANATH MISRA, CJ
Get PriceState of Uttarakhand & Ors. Vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher [SEPTEMBER 15, 2017] Judgement Date : september/2017 , Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 689 SC
Get PriceMay 21, 2017 The matter also related to mining and stone crushing along the banks of the Ganga. (Photo for representational purpose) The Centre has moved the Supreme Court over the Uttarakhand High Court judgement to accord the status of a “living human entity” to the Ganga river, citing administrative issues relating to the implementation of the order
Get PriceFor this, the learned AR submitted true copies of the order of ITAT in the case of M/s. Uttarakhand Stone Products Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.347/Del/2009 of Bench 'H', New Delhi dated 26.04.2010 and M/s. Jai Shree Ram Stone Crushers (I) Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.348/Del/2009 of
Get PriceMay 22, 2017 The Centre has moved the Supreme Court over the Uttarakhand High Court judgement to accord the status of a “living human entity” to the Ganga river, citing administrative issues relating to the implementation of the order.Uttarakhand minister and state government spokesperson Madan Kaushik cited the High Court order of March
Get PriceJul 05, 2017 On December 5, 2016, the Uttarakhand High Court had prohibited mining in the Ganga riverbed. In response the state government had filed a Special Leave Petition, and in May the Supreme Court
Get PriceNo stone crusher shall operate in the above-said area from August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in the Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs
Get PriceMar 20, 2017 Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel, for the State of Uttarakhand. Dated: March 20, 2017 Coram: Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma , J. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Per: Hon. Rajiv Sharma, J. Vide judgment dated 5.12.2016, this Court had issued the following mandatory directions to the respondents: - “1. Respondent nos. 3 to 7 are directed to evict
Get PriceMay 22, 2017 Matter also related to mining and stone crushing along the banks of Ganga Dehradun : The Centre has moved to the Supreme Court over the Uttarakhand High Court judgement to accord the status of a “living human entity” to the Ganga river, citing administrative issues relating to the implementation of the order
Get PriceFeb 08, 2021 Uttarakhand Glacier Burst: Supreme Court in 2013 stayed all hydro electric power projects in Uttarakhand, but case is in limbo, with centre now wanting to grant clearance. Uttarakhand
Get PriceJul 08, 2017 The high court’s order had come on a PIL by Hardwar-resident Mohammed Salim regarding illegal sandmining and stone crushing along the banks of the Ganga. (Representational Image) The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the Uttarakhand High Court order according the status of “living human entity” to Ganga and Yamuna rivers
Get Pricesupreme court judgement on stone crushers uttarakhand - mc the high court’s order had come on a pil by hardwar-resident mohammed salim regarding illegal sandmining and stone crushing along the banks of the ganga. (representational image) the supreme court on friday stayed the uttarakhand high court order according the status of “living
Get Pricein the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no. 14874 of 2017 (arising out of slp(c)no.19445 of 2004) state of uttarakhand & ors. ... appellants versus kumaon stone crusher ... respondent with c.a. no. 14446/2017 @ slp(c)
Get PriceOct 10, 2017 On 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher [1] deciding the issue of levy of transit fee on forest produce arising out of the States of Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh. The State Governments levied transit fees on forest produce under the Indian Forests Act
Get PriceMay 22, 2017 Matter also related to mining and stone crushing along the banks of Ganga Dehradun : The Centre has moved to the Supreme Court over the Uttarakhand High Court judgement to accord the
Get PriceWww Stone Crusher Supreme Court Judgement. Supreme Court Judgement On Stone Crushers Uttarakhand. In the Shriram Gas Leakage Case and the Stone-Crusher Case, Judgement of the Supreme Court of India in the matter of State of Uttarakhand & Others Vs Kumaon Stone
Get PriceMay 15, 1992 Supreme Court Judgments. Subscribe. JAN TO JUNE; JULY TO DEC; Sub Menu contents. M.C. Mehta Vs. ... Writ Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed to pass into the air, and due to pollution, lives of the people living in some parts of
Get PriceCorrespondence The Registrar, Supreme Court of India, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 -24,23388942 FAX : ,23381584 e-mail : supremecourt[at]nic[dot]in
Get PriceISLAMABAD UrduPoint / Pakistan Point News - 5th Mar 2020 The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments to ensure plantation on stone crushing site and directed to stop stone crushing on Margalla Hills A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed and comprised Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan and Justice Sajjad Ali
Get Price